It frequently comes back to haunt me that some years back i used to unironically wear chinese shein and those sort of trendy clothing to school and thought it looked cute. in high school i hardly had 'friends', just some people that i was friendly with who would sometimes say hello. i don't mean to sound like a farming-for-sympathy faggot, but i absolutely did not 'fit in' with the crowd of people i wanted to be a part of. though i did get some compliments for these outfits, it was all so performative and tasteless. but i'm happy to tell you that i now thrift for all my clothes and have developed my own sense of style.
people crave power and authority from a place of their own insecurities, so they will satisfy these desires by conforming to the hivemind. the hivemind will give them the validation they need; the hivemind will give them power they want. From this we get the culture of normalfaggotry. The existence of hiveminds have unfortunately been worsened by the evergrowing presence of negro culture within zoomer soziety, where normalfags all listen to their music, walk, talk, dress, and act like niggers. The normalization of degeneracy is in great part due to this proliferation of nigga culture...The amount of faggots who i have seen that want to be ghetto hood GANG niggers is very concerning, but i suppose you can let them grow out of it (enough). Although i despise those kinds of people, It is not completely without merit that certain 'hiveminds' exist. Humans evolved sacrificing the interests of the individual in favor of the collective so the tribe could survive and fend off 'da opps'. Trends are only an inevitable construct of human culture, and i'm forever grateful for those who follow them because it only makes interesting people shine twice as bright. the absence of normalfags would just make everyone a normalfag.
As an ardent right-vvinger i think i have made it abundantly cleare that i am not very fond of the left and their antics. Much of it was born of counter-culture; the disdain for the establishment which pushes retarded idpol shenanigans and liberal social policy, combined with the fact that i was surrounded by larping edgelords. I recently rediscovered magmashice and rowdy shitposting, trvly a blast from the past lolmao. in 2021 it was easy to laugh at those sort of raging 'SJW' lefty types, the ones constantly sperging about white fragility or how oppressed and strong they are then the next second being mega butthurt that someone used the wrong set of neo-pronouns on them or whatever. If you'd like a very simple explanation of the 'left-right' modern political banter, i;ll give you one ::: the modern sozial and political divide is largely one of gender: young men are leaning further right, and young women are leaning further left, and this gap is only growing by the minute. today this political divide is more relevant than ever, in the world where "man vs bear" is a serious conversation that people have, and in a culture that is now shifting away from that gay left shit. as i have pointed out before, in 2020 and before this divide was much less severe. Young men still leaned more right than women (as they always tended to), but otherwise they were pretty liberul!!. what happened? what happened is that the left went full retard mode with the identity politics and exclusionary practices... what i mean to get at is that young men don't exactly feel welcomed by the left, where they're told that they are the problem and that they are le evil oppresseurs and such things. And if for some strange reason, you feel kind of offended by the notion that "all men are evil rapists", then you're also a contributor to those problems, and also it's not sexist to say that because men have all le institutional power (and they wonder why they lack support from men!). listen, i get that it's not about being 'nice' or whatever but good luck trying to rally support from the very people who you need it from the most XD . When you've alienated half the population, when you have antagonized the very people who keep society running, you have really only set yourself up for failure, and that is why the cultural right is winning so hard right now. The rise of figures like Andrew tate and toxic masculinity was merely a response to toxic femininity, leftism, and the emasculation of men in popular culture. Young men have no place but the right. The left is worthless to them.!!
If you have paid attention to picture related, it is evident that the leftardation of women have been growing much steeper than the rightoidification of men throughout recent years (with the exception of South Korea, i guess you can blame this on the rampant 4B) / What it all means is that the cultural divide is spearheaded by women becoming far-left in giving in to those sort of 'progressive' views . . . i'll tell you There's a reason why so many women are gravitated towards the left.
The Hivemind of Fempathy
The feminininity of the left is really simple when you think about it . . .You have often seen these type of people complain that men have 'zero empathy' and that women are all natural empaths and such things, and that's why we should live in a matriarchy or whatever other retarded ideal of a soicety they have. i'll deconstruct this for you .. if you have ever went on a fat bitch sozial medija profile, you will know that all her skinny bad bitch friends be lying to her tlakin bout oh she so pretty and body positivity this body positivity that. women aren't retarded, they know that what they're saying is a load of horseshit, but they do it anyway ! ! it's where the stereotype of women having superficial relationships comes from, and like all stereotypes it does have some truth. This is the so-called 'empathy' that the left loves to tout upon their ideological opponents, it is just being nice and i suppose more 'understanding' towards people in struggle, like fat people (le oppressed group). the problem really just presents itself: all it does is make the fat friend feel good about being FAT instead of addressing her unhealthy weight, and you can see this type of harm avoidance mentality all over the left. they will happily ignore the problems that come with unchecked mass immigration because it would be mean towards those colored oppressed people, and as we all know racial minorities can't do any wrong, it's all le evil white man's fault!. they won't tell 'plus sized' people to lose weight because that would hurt their feelings, it would be muh fatphobic!!. it is all emotional regulation, and when you have a culture built off of this gay walking-on-eggshells language it just breeds resentment and everyone is just going to want to kill each other for not being woke enough. this is where the fervent cultish and tribalist aspect of the left comes from, the incredibly staunch "you're either with us or against us" attitude.. if you have observed communist banter for more than four seconds, you know that they all hate eachother. If you're anything but a leninistmarxist stalinist whatever-the-hell you are a fascist revisionist traitor and not a real communist (you're not woke enough!). I don't mean to attribute tribalism solely to the left::as all human culture tends towards, the right does too have its insulars, like the migatards being ethnically replaced.. However, the left takes it to a brand new level . . While rightoids can at least respect eachother's existence and sometimes work together, the left will tear itself a new one in pursuit of whatever abstract vision of a revolution they have, and destroying whatever is a deemed threat to that revolution. This is the central driving force of the left, progress towards the 'revolution', conformity to the ideology and revolution (the 'hivemind'), no matter what has to be done to get there. it's why they will starve victims of communism of any grief or sympathy, because their existence is a bother to dur revolution. it's why lenin killed other socialist peoples and the Kulaks, because they were a threat to his revolution and his power. it's why breadtube creators like Vaush and Natalie Wynn hate their own audiences, they're so fragile you cannot talk to them about anything. they have cultivated an environment where any and all dissent is seen as the rebirth of Hitler, and of course Leftists will crush anything that contradicts their retarded worldview (it opposes der revolution!!!). it's why leftist forums all end up as giant echo-chambers where anything too 'right-winged' or politically incorrect is blocked, banned, and deleted instantly. It's gotten so bad that even leftist men aren't safe from this scrutiny. You're a misoggyknees just by virtue of being a man now, lel. Unironically, /pol/ is a better place to discuss politics because instead of blocking out dissent they engage with it even more than regular posts.
It is this violent tribalism that keeps the left from agreeing with itself and acting as one homogenous few who want liberation, and ultimately as you have seen throughout the last few years it has completely destroyed and lost itself.
Identity politiks were really only the beginning of the end for them.
The revolution will have gender pronouns, cute winter boots, and free handouts to black people so we can ease them of the oppression they go through on a daily basis.
Power
In the last piece i'd said that "leftists worship power, and that's why they are so prevalent". i didn't elaborate upon this there, but i'd like to rephrase this. Leftists worship the power in weakness, because weakness is common. They worship empathy over logic, they worship 'equality' over hierarchy, they worship comforting lies over TRVTH, they worship victimhood over fact , they worship the establishment and are the establishment .. So Imagine if you will , a soicety that was solely built by the feminine mind...For men, it is all about hierarchies and the social ladder. For women, the opposite is true. The feminine society is deeply egalitarian. Women will often say that "All women are beautiful" (ekwul) even though they know it's not true. You will never catch a man saying "All men are strong" (ekwul), because men don't believe in that sort of thinking. this feminine egalitarianism is where the concept of the 'feminine economy' comes from, which literally just describes some pseudo-socialist adjacent society. And i tell you this, it is because this is the difference between the left and the right; it is the feminine (egalitarian) worldview, and the masculine (hierarchical) worldview. Not 'opposing vs supporting the establishment' or 'good vs bad' . as any good rightoid knows ::: inequality is good, inequality is inevitable.
Women are physically weak compared to men, so they wield power through relationships, social warfare, and sex. Although many leftists tend to ignore facts in favor of a more comfortable truth, many radikale feminists will admit that, to achieve dur feminist utopia, women must embrace their rule of the mind while men are the rulers of the world: the mental and physical. This difference in the nature of the sexes' social power is why women will falsely accuse men of rape when they decide they don't like them, or why women constantly gossip and manifest drama among each other , or why many women will objectify themselves for men in order to pursue their goals. A woman threatening to ruin someone's social status or offering sexual favors to get what she wants is the equivalent of a man threatening physical violence to get what he wants. Women are very drawn to the left because of its 'empathetic' or otherwise egalitarian thinking, because that is how they operate socially among themselves as well. It's why the left needs to constantly show you pictures of random ass third worlders suffering to show you that MASS IMMIGRATION IS GOOD ACTUALLY, don't you have any empathy for this poor starving child? The left's cancel culture comes from its highly feminine worldview, it is social warfare, it is the stripping of status from other people for disagreeing with them, it is the shunning of people for standing in the way of the hivemind. If it is decided that you don't adhere to the feminine hivemind.maybe you believe that not all women are beautiful, perhaps you will be shamed for not being a "girl's girl", or be cancelled by lefty twitter for saying something they don't like.
When surveyed, an overwhelming majority of women say that they would rather be asked out, and a majority of men said they would rather ask out. When a woman has a crush on a man and wants advice on what to do, she will often be told by other men to "just ask him out, you have a 90% success rate". This is absolutely the best course of action, but even still this guidance falls on deaf ears. It is not that she's retarded and believes this advice is useless, she knows well that she has the odds incredibly in her favor. It's that she needs to protect her ego. Understand -- rejection is a very different and harsher experience for women compared to men. In any society, the men are very important, however it is ultimately in the women's power to choose who to mate with. If two tribes of men go to war, the women would actually have an incentive for their own side to lose so they could have higher quality men to mate with, were it not for mass rapings. Especially in the modern world due in great part to the over-socialization of the internet, the dating market is heavily skewed towards women's favor; women have a monopoly on power in dating. Women are the 'choosers', and men are the 'chosen'. For a woman, a chooser, to rejected by a man she chose, would be to strip her of all her power and ego. Even if by a slim margin, lots of women will not take this risk. That is why, instead of asking him out directly, she will try to present herself in the most feminine way possible around him and start hawking out-of-touch and retarded 'hints' for the man to receive. She wants to get him to ask her out, and in this way, there is hardly any risk involved of an outright rejection and thus the humiliation of her social power. Men on the other hand, are conditioned to expect rejection. It might be disappointing, but he had it stacked against him from the beginning.
What it all means is that WOMYN WANT TO BE CONQUERED, and men want to conquer. it is only natural because of the biological differences between men and women. Women allocate all responsibility on the man to ask her out, in the same way that leftists allocate all responsibility to the government to fix everything. The funny thing about the Cathedral (Leftist institutional and cultural hegemony) is that it always happens to agree with itself, yet the left do not. To discredit Yarvin on one thing, the institutions that make it up are most certainly centralized, and are not the mysterious homogeneous force he thinks it is. At the center of this network lies the Jewish Heart, volatile and greedy. Make no mistake: 'The Left' and the Cathedral are not the same thing, though they describe similar concepts. The Cathedral is the amalgamation of the most useful mantras of the Left that are needed to undermine western soziety. Journalists are trained to spit useful lies, never truths. The whims of the cathedral always reflect the will of the Jewish Heart, and that is, to decay western society. What WE BEAR WITNESS in the world right now right now is a society that has been co-opted by toxic femininity, where people's feelings are taken into consideration before all else, where the left has conquered all the institutions, where we are losing sight of the very things that has been a-part of soicety for hundreds of years, where they treat people like children, where they undermine our integrity, where lowering birth rates and divorce rates are seen as good, and where there are no bad methods, just 'bad people'. YOU HAVE BUILT A SOCIETY BASED AROUND THE WORLDVIEW OF WHAT MAKES YOU FEEL GOOD , AND YOU HAVE DESTROYED IT AND YOURSELF IN THE PROCESS. THIS IS merely THE EXPRESSION of what happens when you let toxic femininity rule over you, and there will be without a doubt, a severe response from the tired right. AND THIS I BELIEVE, IS WHERE OUR PROGRESSIVISM WILL APPEAR. YOU NEED NOT WAIT ANY LONGER FOR THE RIGHT'S OWN.
The Fate of the Right
Nostalgia and resentment share a common denominator — their force is negative, a push away from the status quo without a pull towards an alternative; the right lacks a clear, positive, or utopian vision for society. Consequently, a large portion of our resources is spent undermining the vision of social progress of the left. The rightist willingly assumes the role of the conservative villain in the leftist paradigm; he attempts only to stop or slow down their vision of social progress, never to advance his own.Leftists unironically believe that progress in society is completely linear, where they will claim a monopoly on all progress ever, and that everything they're doing now (white genocide, collective guilt, socialism) is merely a continuation of this 'progress' that they have supposedly brought to the world. But as much as they like to call those opposed to their autism 'reactionaries' or blind bootlicking zealots, they themselves follow the dogma of a nearly 200 year old ideology that killed 100 million people. But no, it doesn't count because it didn't happen in the way i like it, so it must not be real! The first step of recruiting someone to a cult is to remove any and all personhood, and in this way the Left are the most blind zealots. Their ideology supplants the current system with authoritative collectivist measures that beckon the total annihilation of the individual's interests. If i were to be sat down by a leftist queen who told the entire history of the world: how we abolished slavery (progress) and abandoned religion in favor of science (progress) i would be rooting on for the 'progressives' because they seem to be killing it so hard throughout all of human history. But of course we live in the real world, not the fanatic radicals' world. Hitler's regime was seen as 'progressive' by the Germans as well. We all think what we're doing is 'correct' or 'progressive' in that it is going to make society better, but will it really? My point here is that progress isn't inherent to the left, it never has been, and it never will be. There is no progress to be had in what the left is doing.
~jewish russian chud.
it is becoming increasingly apparent to the men and even some women of soicety that leftism is not a way to go about the social concerns of our world, and the left's violence is what pushed them to the right. It's either 1. You have the exact same positions as me (good) or 2. We differ (wtf literally hitler you're perpetuating fascist systems of oppression!!), and no one appreciates this treatment. The culture shift we are witnessing is the equivalent of a wife bitching her husband and he finally snaps back at her. It can only end in two ways, and that is: she's going to divorce you (civil war) or she sits down and stops being a bitch (epic win!). To leftists, yes you are my wife in this situation, and i'm going to bet that the divide between us will only get larger, and i don't think you will sit down and take the rightist snapback (case in point: tiktok revolution). But culture is cyclical, and yes i'm giving you the "strong men create easy times" shit. This is hardly an incidental, and i won't put it past the establishment to try to corrupt the right like they did the left, or for the right to adopt the extreme insularity of the left in the coming years. James Lindsay's mischaracterizations of the dissident right as 'woke' are infantile and weak, and would most certainly destroy the right from the inside if given more credit. It is the great indulgence of the right-wing to constantly dunk on the left, not unlike what i am doing right now. Most of what the right does is merely in response to the left, especially in the case of mainstream rightism. The left is a good enemy that keeps the right mobilized: Were the leftists and radicals to disappear overnight, much of the right would be deactivated as well. Unlike the right, leftists actually have a framework for society they want to see implemented (no matter how retarded), while the right wants nothing but to halt their 'progress' and retvrn to the good ol days that never really existed. Their vision of the past is overly idealistic, and I don't mean to reject that we live in a degenerate society, because we absolutely do. 50 years ago had its pros and cons compared to today, and the right should stop adopting this reactionary attitude, even as much as the 'we were great' rhetoric has helped spread the movement. Although it is very true that the right has slowly trended away from this sort of thinking in recent years, we still do not have concrete framework with which to build a rightist society, and if we are to ride this wave then what must be done is to abandon nostalgia and embrace our own progressivism.
To leftists, i reluctantly have to congratulate you for proliferating your cultural hegemony over the last couple decades, but as long as you stay 'woke' there will be no such thing as the proletarian revolution, 'the abolishment of gender', or whatever other ridiculous concepts you hold dear. There is a certain amount of tolerance normalfags can give your shenanigans before it starts getting annoying, and that line was crossed in recent years. It is all coalescing in the booming of the cultural right and Donald's epic victory royale. When an incel becomes ruler of your country you're going to have no one to blame but yourself. You're the reason why young men follow toxic figures like andrew tate, and you're the reason why le evil nazis are winning. There is a reason why 50% of SAVE EVROPE tards aren't even white, and i'm not sure you're ready for that conversation. If there's one thing the left should take away from what is happening, it is that they need to appeal to the powerful before they appeal to the weak. I suspect that in the coming years there will be harder crackdowns on the woke activity by the mass, but only time will tell.
Lucy